So, there was a complete eclipse over a 70-mile-wide swath
of our country today. The rest of us reveled (suffered?) with 60 – 80% coverage
of Moon invasion. I was outside for about an hour and, yes, it was pretty cool
to see.
At the end of my work day, I needed to stop at the bank. The
teller was friendly and asked if I had seen the eclipse. I acknowledged seeing
it and she asked, “Was it cool?”
That
told me she didn’t see it.
Talking to another
of the bank employees later, she said that a couple of them think they saw it
looking out the window. Of course a bank can’t let its employees abandon
stations to look skyward, but it made me think.
Recently, I had a conversation with a gentleman who would be
well known by Michigan football fans. As I didn’t get his permission, I don’t
feel right mentioning his name. He was a very successful running back for the
Wolverines and has remained in Ann Arbor. We see each other a couple of times a
week at a favorite lunch stop. He’s African-American – and that does matter to
the story.
He was finishing a big plate of greens and I was working my
way through a Greek salad – we routinely discuss sports, Ann Arbor politics,
his daughter – just stuff. I asked him what he thought about the destruction of
Confederate monuments currently in the news.
He described his youth in a Southern state where the statues
were prevalent throughout his hometown. He recalls that his grandmother told him
they were there to keep him and “our people” down. He said that the statues
were placed deliberately as a warning to the Black community that things
could return to the antebellum ways of slavery. He referenced the well known epitaph: "The South shall rise again" as part of the overall intimidation.
This is a subject that I’ve spent very little time
considering. I do remember wondering why a statue of Nathan Bedford Forrest – a
Confederate general and key figure in the founding of the Ku Klux Klan stood in
a prominent spot in Memphis – my adoptive home for six years. I guess what I really
wondered was why it “still” stood in the 1990s.
My friend suggested that if I was interested, I look into
when many of these statues were erected.
I know that I can be anecdotally refuted on the margins, but
what I found was that most were erected in close proximity after two major
Supreme Court decisions. The first,
Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) created the “separate but equal” standard that
solidified segregation practices that existed through much (most?) of the 20th
Century. The second was Brown v. Board of Education (1954) which overturned the
Plessy v. Ferguson findings of “separate but equal.”
This was the Warren Court and it ruled unanimously (9-0)
that “separate educational facilities are inherently unequal.” In other words,
segregation was ruled a violation of the 14th Amendment (Equal
Protection Clause).
“Why would it?” he replied. The timing of the constructions did underscore the probable intention of intimidation.
This isn’t, mind you, a zero-sum game. Not every allusion to the history of the
Confederacy should be deboned. We can’t afford to forget our nation’s history –
no matter how pained. But when there is likely intention of intimidation
and, perhaps, even blatant racism, we should address it. Destroy everything? Nope. Keep everything for
“history’s sake?” Nope.
Each local community needs to address their public statuary
in the full, uneclipsed light of their history and intention.
Other voices:
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/13/us/charlottesville-rally-protest-statue.html
